A defensible risk narrative
Attack-path counts, blast radius, and trend lines that survive hostile questions, because each number links to the actual paths behind it.
[ Solutions / By role ]
Three jobs. One graph. No translation layer.
A security platform is bought once but lived in by three different people. Here is what actually changes for each of them: pains first, promises second, and the metrics each role can defend in their own meetings.
[ ROLE-01 ]
Security leadership
For the CISO
One risk number you can defend in front of the board
Your world today
- Fourteen consoles, none of which agree on what 'critical' means
- Board asks 'are we getting better?' and the honest answer is a shrug with charts
- Every headcount request competes with a tool renewal
Metrics you'll actually report
- Critical attack paths, trended
- Mean time to remediate, by team
- Control conformance, by framework
What changes with Vault
Consolidation with receipts
Posture, detection, identity, and compliance in one platform. Customers typically retire 3–6 point tools: we will tell you which of yours we do not replace.
Audit season without the war room
Continuous evidence means the exam is a review of what already exists, not a quarter of your team's life.
"The board deck used to take my deputy two weeks a quarter. Now it is an export, and for the first time, the trend line is one I trust."
See the board-deck sample
Included in every demo for security leaders
[ ROLE-02 ]
Engineering
For DevOps & platform teams
Security findings that read like good bug reports
Your world today
- Tickets that say 'fix S3 bucket' with no account, no resource, no context
- Scanners that block every PR and cry wolf until everyone stops listening
- Agents that eat node headroom and break on every kernel upgrade
Metrics you'll actually report
- False-positive rate on gated checks
- Time-to-fix, PR-open to merged
- Sensor overhead, measured per node
What changes with Vault
Findings as pull requests
The exact resource block, the suggested fix, and the reason it matters: in your repo, under 90 seconds after the Terraform plan.
Agentless by default
Read-only API access covers posture, identity, and control-plane detection. The eBPF sensor is optional, and its 0.6% p95 CPU cost is published, not hidden.
Least-privilege as code review
Identity Map drafts the reduced IAM policy as a PR. You review a diff, not a philosophy debate.
"It is the first security tool that files issues the way a good senior engineer would: exact resource, proposed diff, and an honest severity."
Get a sandbox tenant
Pre-loaded demo estate: break it freely
[ ROLE-03 ]
GRC & audit
For compliance leads
Retire screenshot season permanently
Your world today
- Three auditors asking for the same evidence in three different formats
- Evidence that is stale by the time the field work starts
- A spreadsheet of 400 controls where 'owner' is a wish, not a name
Metrics you'll actually report
- % of evidence auto-collected
- Audit field-work days, cycle over cycle
- Control conformance, real-time
What changes with Vault
Evidence that collects itself
Timestamped artifacts on an auto-recollection schedule, mapped across all 27 frameworks: collect once, satisfy many.
An auditor seat, not an email thread
Scoped read-only access for the engagement window. Auditors pull their own evidence; every access is logged.
Gaps with names and dates
Every failing control has an owner, a due date, and a link to the fix: synced to ticketing, reportable upward.
"Our SOC 2 Type II observation period closed with zero exceptions, and I did not build a single evidence binder. I still don't fully believe it."
Take the evidence tour
A 20-minute walkthrough with a compliance-focused SE
[ Next step ]
See your own estate in the graph
A 45-minute demo on your environment, run by a named solutions engineer: no slideware. Or let the comparison tool tell you honestly whether you should buy us at all.