4.9 out of 5, across 327 inspections.

• ★★★★★

  June 2026

  “Evan found a double-tapped breaker and a bath fan blowing into the attic — then talked me off the ledge about both. The report told me what mattered, what it might cost, and what was just an old house being an old house. We negotiated $4,200 off with his summary page, unedited.”

• ★★★★★

  May 2026

  “Report hit my inbox at 7:40 p.m. the same day, severity-coded with photos of every finding. My lender asked who did it because the WDI form came in cleaner than they usually see.”

• ★★★★★

  May 2026

  “I send every client here and I've never once regretted it. Datum describes, they don't dramatize — my buyers come out of the walkthrough informed instead of terrified, and the one-page summary drops straight into my repair request. The agent line actually gets answered.”

• ★★★★ ☆

  April 2026

  “Fair warning: the report is LONG. Fifty-eight pages for our 1970s split-level, and it took us a full evening to get through. But nothing in it was padding, and the free follow-up call answered every question. Docked a star only because the spring calendar was tight — we had to wait five days for a slot.”

• ★★★★★

  April 2026

  “The sewer scope paid for itself 40 times over — root intrusion in the clay lateral at the property line, on video with footage markers. Seller replaced the run before closing. $195 well spent on a 1962 house.”

• ★★★★★

  March 2026

  “Did a pre-listing inspection before going to market. Fixed the cheap stuff, disclosed the rest with Datum's report attached — got three offers and zero inspection renegotiation. My agent now recommends this to every listing client.”

• ★★★★★

  March 2026

  “New construction, so I almost skipped the inspection. Datum's final walkthrough found a disconnected dryer duct, a dead exterior GFCI circuit and missing attic baffles across half the roofline. The builder fixed all of it before closing without argument. 'New' is not the same as 'checked.'”

• ★★★★ ☆

  February 2026

  “Thorough, punctual, honest — Dana told me the mold sampling I asked about would be a waste of money on this house, which I respect enormously. Four stars because report jargon occasionally sent me to Google (what is a 'TPR valve'), though the glossary link did cover it.”

• ★★★★★

  February 2026

  “As a listing agent, a Datum report on the other side of the table is honestly good news — no inflammatory language, no 'potential' this and 'possible' that. Findings, evidence, cost context. Deals survive contact with their reports.”

• ★★★★★

  January 2026

  “The radon monitor read 6.8 pCi/L — above the action level. Instead of drama, we got a one-pager on mitigation costs and a $1,100 seller credit. The system runs quietly in the basement and the retest came back at 0.9. Exactly how this is supposed to work.”

• ★★★★★

  December 2025

  “Asked Evan point-blank whether we should buy the house. He said 'I can't answer that — but here's the condition, here's what the big items cost, and here's what I'd budget for year one.' That non-answer was the most useful answer we got from anyone in the whole transaction.”

• ★★★★★

  November 2025

  “Booked online at 10 p.m., confirmed by 8 the next morning, inspected two days later. The whole thing — thermal survey included — cost less than one month of what the furnace they flagged would have cost me in repairs.”

Why show 4-star reviews? Because a wall of perfect scores tells you about a company's filtering, not its inspections. The two above are real feedback we acted on — spring capacity got a third inspector's schedule, and the report glossary now links from every technical term.