Key facts
- Google Search Console is the source that shows exactly which queries brought people to your site through organic search, along with clicks and impressions for each one, and a real SEO report should be built from it.
- New pages and updated pages take time to be indexed and to gain visibility, so a monthly report from the first few months of a campaign should show published and optimized page counts even before rankings move much.
- Technical SEO issues, like broken pages, slow load times, or pages accidentally blocked from search engines, show up in Search Console's own coverage and experience reports and should be named specifically when they're found and fixed.
- Keyword rank tracking tools show position for a fixed list of target terms, but that list only reflects value if it's tied to search terms real customers actually type, not just terms that are easy to rank for.
- Meaningful SEO results typically build over roughly six months to a year, so a fair monthly report in the early months should focus on completed work and technical health, not only on how far rankings have moved yet.
Organic Traffic and Visibility, Straight From Search Console
A report should show clicks and impressions for organic search overall, and ideally break that down by page or by query group so you can see where the movement is actually coming from.
It should also show which queries are gaining or losing position, pulled from Search Console data directly rather than presented only as a black-box third-party number with no way to verify it.
Comparing against the previous period matters just as much here as it does for paid campaigns, since a single snapshot doesn't show direction.
The Actual Work Completed That Month
The report should list pages published, pages updated or optimized, and any technical fixes shipped during the period, specifically, not as a vague summary line.
If link building or citation work is part of the scope, it should be described with real specifics rather than a generic phrase like "link building activity" that could mean almost anything.
This section is what proves work actually happened, even in the early months before rankings have fully caught up to reflect it.
Technical Health, Named Specifically
A thorough report names crawl errors, indexing issues, page speed problems, and mobile usability issues, stating clearly which were fixed and which are still outstanding.
This should reference specific pages or issue types rather than a generic "site health: good" line that tells you nothing verifiable.
Recurring issues, the kind that keep reappearing month after month, deserve their own callout, since a fix that doesn't hold is its own separate problem worth flagging.
Leads and Business Impact, Not Just Rankings
The report should show leads, calls, or form submissions attributed to organic search traffic, tied back to the specific pages producing that impact.
Early-stage reports may show more completed work than actual leads, and that's genuinely fine as long as it's explained clearly rather than left unaddressed.
Over time, this section is what should shift from "here's the work" toward "here's what the work produced," and that shift is worth tracking explicitly.
Related questions
Rankings matter, but they shouldn't be the only number in the report. A page can rank well and still produce no leads, or rank modestly while producing steady enquiries because the query itself has strong buying intent. Ask for rankings alongside organic clicks, impressions, and any leads tied back to those specific pages, not rankings in isolation.
That's a thin report. Ask what specific work happened that month, which pages were touched, and what technical issues were found and fixed. A rankings chart alone tells you direction without telling you cause, and you're paying for the completed work itself, not just the chart. If the agency can't fill in that detail on request, that gap is worth raising directly.
Cross-check them against your own Google Search Console and Google Analytics accounts directly, using your own login rather than only the agency's exported numbers. If you don't currently have access to those accounts yourself, that's worth fixing so you can always verify any report independently. Discrepancies between your own dashboard and the agency's numbers are worth asking about directly, rather than assuming either side simply made an error.
It's increasingly relevant, but treat it as a separate, clearly labeled section rather than mixed into traditional Google rankings, since the two are measured differently. If your agency is doing dedicated AI search or GEO work, ask for it to be reported on its own terms with its own evidence.
Early months are usually heavier on technical fixes and content publishing than on ranking movement, since meaningful SEO results generally take around six months to a year to fully show. A fair early report should be full of completed work, even if the traffic and ranking numbers haven't moved much yet.
Want a second opinion on your situation?
Get a free, no-obligation proposal. We’ll look at your site and your market and tell you honestly what we’d do — and what we wouldn’t.
Get your free proposal