Mass Tort Website Design
Mass Tort Website Design built to screen, not just collect leads.
Mass tort growth is a volume game across national campaigns for active litigations, but an unscreened lead that doesn't meet the criteria for a case wastes staff time your intake team can't get back. Your site needs a dedicated, compliant page per active litigation with screening questions built into the intake form itself, because the number that decides ROI here is signed retainers, not raw form fills.
- One-time packages, $1,500 to $20,000+
- No contracts, 30-day guarantee
- You own the finished site outright
What a mass tort site needs
Built to filter claimants before they reach intake.
One page per active litigation, not a shared page
Each litigation, whether a defective drug, device, or product case, gets its own page written to the exact criteria that matters for that claim, so paid campaigns land visitors on the message that actually applies to them.
Screening questions built into the intake form
Qualifying questions asked before a claimant reaches a live person, so your intake team spends time on people who plausibly meet the criteria for the litigation instead of chasing down leads that never qualify.
A response fast enough to win the signature
Claimants often submit information to more than one firm running the same campaign, and the firm that responds and screens first is usually the one that signs the retainer, so intake speed has to be built into the site, not bolted on after.
Compliant copy that holds up under bar review
Language written to stay within advertising rules for the litigation types you run, since a claim-specific campaign that oversteps compliance risks the whole page, not just one line of copy.
What your budget actually buys.
Transparent one-time pricing
Packages run $1,500 to $20,000+ depending on how many active litigations, screening flows, and landing pages your firm runs. Full breakdown on our website packages page.
You own the site, not a lease
Hosting and the domain stay registered to your firm, never to us. No monthly platform fee attached to the claimant pipeline your campaigns generate.
The right platform for a volume-driven intake operation
WordPress if your marketing team wants to spin up a new litigation page themselves as cases develop. Astro or Next.js when you're running paid traffic at national scale and every second of load time affects your cost per signed retainer. We recommend based on your firm.
See the concept this build starts from
Our personal-injury demo shows a real fast-intake path and educational statute-of-limitations content on a single-firm build. A mass-tort site takes that intake speed and applies it across a screening page for every active litigation you run.
Mass tort website design, step by step.
01
Map your active litigations and screening criteria
We list every litigation you're running and the specific criteria that qualifies a claimant, then check the exact terms claimants search before design starts.
02
Build the screening-first path
A dedicated, compliant page per litigation with screening questions built into intake, all designed to get a qualified claimant signed before they submit to the next firm running the same campaign.
03
Go live under the firm's name
Hosting, the domain, and every login transfer to your firm once the build goes live, with no recurring fee attached to keeping that ownership in place.
Mass tort website design FAQ.
Investment starts around $1,500 and climbs well past $20,000. A firm running one or two active litigations with a screening intake form usually lands in the lower half; a firm running several litigations at national scale with a full screening system lands higher. It's a one-time cost, not a monthly fee.
Each litigation has its own qualifying criteria and its own paid campaign driving traffic. A shared page forces every claimant through the same generic message, while a dedicated page matches the exact claim, which improves both compliance and the quality of who actually reaches intake.
A cheap lead that doesn't meet the criteria for a litigation still costs staff time to review and disqualify. The number that decides whether a campaign worked is cost per signed retainer, and screening questions built into the intake form filter out non-qualifying leads before they ever reach a person.
As fast as possible. Claimants in a national campaign often submit their information to more than one firm at once, and the firm that follows up and screens fastest is usually the one that ends up signing the retainer.
It depends on how quickly your litigations change. WordPress suits a firm that wants to launch a new litigation page itself as cases develop. A custom Astro or Next.js build handles national paid traffic more efficiently, which matters when load speed affects your cost per signed retainer at scale. We'll recommend based on your firm.
Get a mass tort website built to screen the next claimant.
Tell us your active litigations, screening criteria, and intake process. You'll get a scoped proposal with one firm number and nothing to sign.