Key facts
- Proposal date 2026-09-24, currency USD, sent by email the same day at the owner's instruction; the shop's name, owner and city are withheld, and the prices are what was quoted on that date, not an offer.
- Starting fee $1,000 a month with a 15-page website included, $0 setup, $0 upfront, a 30-day guarantee and no contract term; the ladder steps to $2,000 and $3,000 at monthly revenue targets agreed together in writing.
- The existing site loaded in under a second with a six-kilobyte home page, but its gallery page weighed over seven megabytes because eight photos were embedded as base64 text, and there was no form anywhere; calls and texts were the only way to reach the shop.
- Three city pages shared one template with the city name swapped, and the site carried no film brand, no shade guide, no tint-law content, no reviews and no logo, so the scope was built around what a tint buyer actually checks.
- The demo's SEO pages quoted the state's vehicle code on window tint with its conditions, listed the common film shades, and added film options, residential and commercial tint, aftercare and a quote form on every page.
The business behind this proposal
The client is a single-owner automotive window tint shop in Northern California with a hand-coded static website of nine pages. The lead came through a proposal request in August from a niche page about tint marketing, and the proposal was built in a September batch at the owner's instruction to review every lead and build a proposal for each.
Tint is bought on three things: whether the shade is legal, whether the film will bubble, and what it costs. The site answered none of them. It had no film brand, no shade guide, no tint-law page, no reviews and no form; a customer could only call or text.
What we measured before pricing it
The home page was the fastest we had measured all month: a perfect Lighthouse mobile score, a largest contentful paint under a second, six kilobytes. The gallery was the opposite, a single page of more than seven megabytes because eight photos were embedded as base64 text rather than image files, and it was the only place on the site with any images at all.
The three city pages shared one template with the city name swapped, which is the kind of near-duplicate a search engine discounts. No form of any kind existed. Those findings set the scope: keep the speed, fix the gallery, replace the swapped-city pages with pages that carry real local substance, and put a quote form on every page.
The offer, exactly as quoted
The house pattern: $1,000 a month to start with the new site included, $0 upfront, a 30-day guarantee, month to month, stepping to $2,000 and $3,000 at monthly revenue targets agreed together in writing. Ad spend separate, budget on the call.
Included rows: Google Ads, a quote form, follow-up, the new 15-page website, SEO with city pages, a tint-law page and aftercare pages, AI search visibility with a proof line from a ChatGPT test, Google Business Profile and reviews, content built from the shop's own jobs, and analytics. The demo was a minimal white site in the shop's black-and-red brand with service pages for automotive tint, film options, residential and commercial work, three genuinely different city pages, a gallery, a quote page and a FAQ, and it quoted the state vehicle code section on window tint with its conditions rather than a vague line about legal limits.
What moved the price, and what was excluded
Nothing pushed the fee above the standard starting point. A one-owner tint shop has a clear ceiling on how many cars it can do in a week, so the ladder was tied to monthly revenue rather than leads, and the steps were left to be agreed on the call once the owner shared real numbers.
Excluded: ad spend, paid by the client to Google; a logo, which the shop did not have, so the demo used a text wordmark in the brand colours; and any film brand claim, since the shop had not stated which films it installs. The tint-law content was written from the state statute and labelled as such, with a note to confirm current rules, because a marketing page is not legal advice.
What happened, and what a tint shop can take from it
The proposal was sent on 2026-09-24 at the owner's instruction, with a follow-up scheduled for five days later. This dossier records that it was sent and reports no outcome.
For a tint or detailing shop, the transferable parts are the quote form on every page, a real tint-law page, city pages with substance rather than swapped names, and photos served as images rather than embedded text. SearchPod's public prices are on the pricing page, and a proposal for your shop takes one business day.
Related questions
No. It is a real proposal, anonymized, with prices as quoted on 2026-09-24 in USD. A proposal for your own shop is built from your situation and starts from the public prices at /pricing.
A one-owner shop can only tint so many cars a week, so leads beyond capacity are worthless. Revenue targets agreed in writing after the first month keep the fee tied to what the owner actually banks, and a slow month steps the fee back down.
The speed was worth keeping and the demo preserved it, but the site had no form, no tint-law content, no film information, no reviews and a seven-megabyte gallery, so a rebuild that kept the speed made more sense than patching.
Ad spend, which the client pays directly; a logo, since none existed; and any film brand claim. The tint-law page was written from the state statute with a note to confirm current rules.
This dossier records that the proposal was sent on 2026-09-24. No outcome is reported because none is known at the time of writing.
a real proposal, anonymized; prices as quoted on that date, not an offer; no client name, person or address is given; SearchPod wrote and sent the proposal described.
Want a quote like this for your project?
Get a free, no-obligation proposal within one business day. We look at your site and your market and tell you plainly what we would do, and what we would not.
Get your free proposal