Skip to content

Research 7 min read Updated September 26, 2026

Which accounting firms does AI recommend in Toronto for a small business?

In short

Asked three times on 2026-09-26 with browsing off to recommend a Toronto accounting firm for a ten-person business, gpt-5.4-mini leaned on national and regional firms. MNP LLP was in every answer, and BDO, Deloitte Private, RSM, Baker Tilly, RLB and Segal GCSE each appeared twice. Small independent practices barely appeared, and every run offered to narrow to budget bookkeeping, payroll and tax, or startup-focused firms.

Key facts

  • Three separate sessions on 2026-09-26 asked gpt-5.4-mini, browsing off, to recommend an accounting firm in Toronto for a small business with ten employees, and to name firms.
  • The runs named 10, 10 and 8 firms, 16 distinct names across 28 mentions, the highest repeat rate in the thirteen-prompt panel.
  • MNP LLP appeared in all three runs. BDO Canada, Deloitte Private, RSM Canada, Baker Tilly, RLB LLP and Segal GCSE LLP each appeared in two, with Grant Thornton appearing under three different spellings across the runs.
  • The lists were dominated by national and large regional firms, including the private-company arms of the largest firms; only a handful of names were mid-sized or local practices, and no sole practitioner or small firm appeared.
  • Every run offered to narrow the list by need: low-cost bookkeeping, payroll and tax, a tech or startup focus, or firms with CPAs experienced with incorporated small businesses; run 3 grouped its list by more personalized service versus broader resources.

What we asked, and the settings

On 2026-09-26 we opened three clean sessions with gpt-5.4-mini, en-CA locale, browsing off, default settings, and asked: "Recommend an accounting firm in Toronto for a small business with ten employees. Name firms." No follow-up was given.

The prompt describes a small business on purpose. The question was whether the model would name the small and mid-sized practices that usually serve a ten-person company, or the large firms whose names it has seen most often.

The three lists, as the model gave them

Run 1 named MNP LLP, BDO Canada, Grant Thornton LLP, RSM Canada, KPMG Enterprise, Deloitte Private, RLB LLP, Doane Grant Thornton, Baker Tilly Toronto LLP and Crawford Smith & Swallow, listing Grant Thornton twice under its older and newer names, and offered to narrow to low-cost bookkeeping, payroll and tax, or a tech and startup focus.

Run 2 named MNP LLP, BDO Canada, Deloitte Private, RSM Canada, Grant Thornton LLP Canada, Baker Tilly Canada, KPMG Private Enterprise, Hogg Shain & Scheck, Segal GCSE LLP and Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte LLP, and offered budget-friendly local firms, tax-focused firms, bookkeeping and payroll firms, or CPAs experienced with incorporated small businesses.

Run 3 named Doane Grant Thornton LLP, MNP LLP, Baker Tilly Canada, RLB LLP, ClearHouse LLP, Segal GCSE LLP, BDO Canada LLP and KPMG's small business service, and grouped them by more personalized service, broader resources and advisory, and a balanced small-business focus.

What repeated

MNP LLP was in every run. BDO Canada, Deloitte Private, RSM Canada, Baker Tilly, RLB LLP and Segal GCSE LLP were each in two. Grant Thornton was in every run in some form, as Grant Thornton LLP, Grant Thornton LLP Canada, Doane Grant Thornton and Doane Grant Thornton LLP, which reflects a real rebrand and shows the model carrying both names at once. KPMG appeared in every run under three different labels for its private-company practice.

Six of the 16 names appeared once, and those six are the only mid-sized or local firms in the whole panel. The pattern is clear: for a ten-person business, the model's first instinct is the national brand.

Patterns in the answers

The follow-up offers were the same in every run and tell you what the model thinks a small business actually wants: cheap bookkeeping, payroll and tax handled together, startup experience, and CPAs who know incorporated small businesses. Run 3 went further and sorted firms by personalized service versus breadth, which is the trade-off a small business owner is really weighing.

Runs 2 and 3 attached a short description to each firm, which we have not verified and do not repeat. None of the runs gave fees, ratings or review counts, and none cited a source, which is expected with browsing off.

What this cannot tell you, and what a small firm can do

This page records what one model said across three tries of one prompt on one date with browsing off. It does not evaluate any firm, and a name here or its absence is not a recommendation from SearchPod or the model. Small and mid-sized practices that serve ten-person businesses every day were almost entirely absent, which says something about the model's memory, not about those firms.

For a small Toronto practice, the finding is the gap. The model wants to sort by bookkeeping, payroll and tax bundles, startup experience and small-business CPAs, and a firm whose site says plainly that it does exactly that for companies of ten people, with the name written the same way everywhere and reviews that mention small business work, is giving the model something it currently lacks. SearchPod builds those pages for accounting clients and tracks which prompts name them.

Related questions

Sources

one model, no browsing, one date, three runs; firm names are recorded as the model wrote them and are not verified or endorsed; SearchPod sells AI visibility work.

Want to know how your business shows up?

Get a free, no-obligation proposal within one business day. We look at your site and your market and tell you plainly what we would do, and what we would not.

Get your free proposal

Keep reading

More in Research

All 37 in Research